![]() This camera shoots at up to 40 frames per second at full resolution with full AF/AE. If the new X-H2, which was just announced, is all about resolution, the X-H2S is all about agility. Inside its SLR-style body is a brand-new 26.1-megapixel stacked X-Trans CMOS 5 HS image sensor, super-fast X-Processor 5, AI-powered autofocus, and much more. Speed is the name of the game with the X-H2S. The X-H2S is all-new, inside and out, and it's an extremely impressive camera. Enter the Fujifilm X-H2S, Fujifilm's most highest-performance X Series camera ever. This spring, the X-H series awoke from its hibernation with a roar. However, it didn't happen, and the X-H series has been dormant. It seemed like an X-H2 was perhaps in the offing back then. However, despite significant advances in technology, a more robust design, IBIS, and improved performance across the board, the X-H1 fell a bit by the wayside as Fujifilm developed and released other new APS-C cameras, like 2020's X-T4, which included an upgraded processor and new 26.1-megapixel X-Trans CMOS IV backside-illuminated image sensor. This image has been converted and processed to taste in Adobe Camera Raw. The new flagship camera was the first X Series camera to include in-body image stabilization and the first to record DCI 4K video with internal log (F-log) recording.įujifilm XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR lens at 238mm (357mm equiv.), F8, 27s, ISO 160. "Hybrid" is a fitting word since the X-H1 was also Fujifilm's most "hybrid" camera yet. ![]() It looked like a hybrid between the GFX series and the X Series. ![]() The camera was larger, featured a bigger grip and sported a large information display on top. At that time, the Fuji X-H1 was an outlier in the Fujifilm X Series lineup. The Fujifilm X-H2S – which has since been joined by the higher-resolution X-H2 – is a fascinating successor to 2018's X-H1. It’s the same for my Nikon D810 with its Active D-Lighting, which I turned off as soon as I got the camera.Fujifilm X-H2S Hands-on Review Is this Fujifilm's best hybrid camera? I seem to remember reading a post here about the need to ensure that certain settings are disabled on the camera because, even though, in theory, you are using RAW files, some things like these fancy dynamic range enhancements in camera do get recorded. Something else that I believe may confirm this is that, for a second or so, when the images are first opened, the thumbnail for PXI_9741 is brighter and then goes darker. My guess is that PhotoLab is detecting that and applying a correction automatically, possibly based on its analysis of the camera body, even though there is no Optics Module available, due to the lens being unknown. Notice how the Dynamic Range Expansion is on in PX1_9741 but is off in PX1_9742. Here’s something I found when opening the two files in RawDigger… I really don’t understand (even if PTGui corrects the lighting issue during the stitch, it remains often a problem with the nadir you say you set the camera to manual but I think I might have found something that you may not have checked in the menus. If someone has any idea about what is happening, and how to solve this, it will help me a lot. Here some screen capture, look at the white bags: My issue: I shoot 6 pictures, 1 every 30° (25% overlapping, even more with the 12mm), and sometimes between 2 pictures I have a high difference in the lighting result. I work with DXO Photoloab 4, every settings are desactivated. Every autosetings are set in “off” in the camera. My gears and settings: Pentax K1+ Samyang 12mm / Raw, everything in manual. I’m doing some spherical panoramas (360x180°), so I shoot everything in Raw and fully in manual mode (except white balance). I don’t think this is a PhotoLab issue, but I don’t understand why I experience this: 2 pictures in Raw, all in manual, same settings => different exposure result.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |